Tag: #qualityassurance

  • Quality Assurance Centre of Excellence – Part 4

    Quality Assurance Centre of Excellence – Part 4

    Today we want to focus on the root cause analysis.

    Focused on Root Causes – This can be applied to both of the previous posts. When it comes to being proactive, the Quality Assurance CoE could look at Root Causes of potential issues and plan around them or else they could look at Root Causes from their analysis and work to understand and solve them. Regardless of which way this is dealt with, the problem could be solved at different levels. We could be looking at Root Causes for software development and deployment or we could be looking at root causes that impact the entire organization (structure, culture, management).

    There are two challenges that a Quality Assurance Specialist usually faces with respect to Root Cause Analysis:

    1. The Root Cause may be difficult to find.
    2. Once found, there may be resistance to fixing the Root Cause

    An example of the first occurs when someone is supplying information to another group and in the process of supplying it the information is manipulated or reformatted in some way. The manipulation adds in an error which is not obvious. The next group uses the erroneous data to make decisions. The error is not large enough to cause major problems but it has an impact further along. No one notices the problem until much later. This makes the Root Cause difficult to find and difficult to correct since no one is recognizing the initial error.

    The second is a much worse problem. The Root Cause has been identified and the solution created. Then there is resistance to making the required changes:

    • The problem may be outside your department.
    • Someone may have to admit they are wrong and have been wrong for years.
    • There may be costs attached to making the change and they will fall on someone else.

    All of the above can lead to resistance to the change.
    Next:  Process Focus

    #QA,#QualityAssurrance,#SoftwareTesting,#SoftwareTestingStrategy,#TASSQ,#NVP

    https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7399187902221443072

  • Testing for System Integrators – Part 2

    Testing for System Integrators – Part 2

    Two days ago we asked two $10,000 dollar questions and this week we promised the possible answers. Unlike the questions, which are specific to the final client and the suppliers, the answers are more general and apply to both.

    1. The contracts state the following specifically about Quality Assurance and everyone is in agreement
    2. The contracts says nothing about it so far but we have Quality Assurance as a topic and the contract will not be finalised without this discussion
    3. The contracts says nothing about Quality Assurance so far but now that you have brought it up we will add it.
    4. There is something in the contracts about Quality Assurance and we can look it up for you (contracts are signed).
    5. There is nothing in the contracts (contracts are signed) and there is no intention of putting anything in the contracts about Quality Assurance
    6. We don’t know (but that is a good question)
    7. We don’t know (and we don’t care)

    Suffice to say the items in the above list have an obvious gradation from good to terrible in the order they are presented. If you get the first answer, you’re well on your way. If you get some of the middle answers you have some work to do, but you may be in time to effect some change. If you get the last few answers, you are in trouble!

    Next: What to do with the answers.

    #QA,#QualityAssurrance,#SoftwareTesting,#SoftwareTestingStrategy,#TASSQ,#NVP

    https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7399187902221443072
  • QA as an Afterthought

    QA as an Afterthought

    Why QA is so often an afterthought?

    1. Is it because QA is ‘traditionally at the end of the project”?
    2. Is it because people have too much else going on at the beginning of a project and cannot think about QA?
    3. Is it because QA does ‘not fit anywhere’ at the corporate level so ends up nowhere?
    4. Is it because QA is regarded as a necessary evil which no one wants to acknowledge?
    5. Is it because we do not know when QA is needed and by the time we find out it is too late to make a difference?
    6. Is it because QA does not do a good job of selling ourselves?
    7. Is it because …

    We could certainly go on with all the reasons that QA seems to be frequently ignored. 

    Not surprisingly, when people do take the time to consider the Return on Investment for QA, they are often shocked by how much it benefits them.

    #QA,#QualityAssurrance,#SoftwareTesting,#SoftwareTestingStrategy,#TASSQ,#NVP

    https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7399187902221443072
  • No plan survives – Part 3

    No plan survives – Part 3

    No plan survives contact with the enemy

    An earlier post referenced the fact that the Quality Assurance and Business Plan need to be integrated to be successful.  In addition, A LATER made the comment that a Quality Assurance initiative can be derailed by passive or active resistance (as can all plans).  Even though Quality Assurance is inherently a long term process, and depends on trends over months and years, there may be a need to change direction.  It is entirely possible that the competitive environment may change or a new discovery changes a process.  The business plan may also change as a result of the items mentioned already or as they try something new.

    Whatever the reason, there has to be flexibility in the QA plan as well.

  • Out of Ideas

    Out of Ideas

    What happens if you are out of ideas of what or how to improve?

    Not surprisingly this has been considered by some of the pioneers of Quality Assurance. They understood that there was a limit to the number of ideas a person could generate.  The recommendation was to change the composition of the group coming up with the solutions while retaining continuity. One recommendation was to change everyone except the group note-taker.  There is nothing to prevent people coming back in a few years with new solutions to new problems (or suggesting them to the new group once they have had a chance to recharge).  Giving a break can work wonders for creativity.

  • National Software Testing and Quality Engineering Conference 

    National Software Testing and Quality Engineering Conference 

    The National Software Testing and Quality Engineering Conference is scheduled to take place on May 26, 2026, at the Delta Marriott in Downtown Toronto– 75 Lower Simcoe St, Toronto, ON M5J 3A6, Canada

    This conference is specifically designed for experts in software testing, quality assurance, and quality engineering, and it aims to provide a thrilling new gathering tailored to their needs.

    The field is currently experiencing a revolution with the introduction of AI, making this an ideal moment for professionals to take charge and stay ahead of the curve.

    By attending this one-day event in May, participants will have the opportunity to network with industry pioneers who are shaping the future, as well as leverage the power of AI through interactive workshops.


    Further information at: https://nationalsoftwaretestingconference.com/about/

  • TestFormation 2026

    Join us again for TestFormation 2026 – now even bigger and better than ever!

    This year’s theme, “Elevating quality in the age of intelligent autonomy: driving trust, transparency, and governance in AI-powered testing“, promises transformative insights through world-class keynotes, panels, and sessions.

    Keynotes:

    • Badal Bhushan (Distinguished Engineer, Walmart): “Testing Tryst in Autonomous AI Systems” – IC³T for agentic AI authority risks
    • Sheena Yap Chan (WSJ bestselling author): “Visible Confidence in AI-Powered QA” – Ethical leadership frameworks
    • Anu Thothathri (Cognizant QE Leader): “From Testing to Trust” – Modern QE for enterprise AI trust
    • Rogerio Castillo (Caliche Energy Solutions Founder): “Testing in the Age of AI” – TMMi for AI-era quality

    Featured Panel (10 AM):
    Engineering Leadership in the Age of AI-Driven Quality” moderated by Dr. Amanda Fetch (AI Advisor), featuring:

    • Tejas Pandit (MeshDefend.ai Co-Founder/CEO): Builds AI-native systems; ex-Dell global teams
    • Wendy Lally (Engineering Director): Hands-on leader in AI, supercomputing, platform engineering; ex-Intel/Dell
    • Himanshu Pathak (Meta QA Automation Lead): Transforms manual QA with GenAI

    Other sessions cover:
    Autonomous AI agent validation, TMMi cloud security maturity, AI-driven governance controls, data governance clarity, GenAI automation frameworks, model-based testing, agentic QA ecosystems, AI testing maturity models, Zero Trust, safe GenAI guardrails, and tool-enabled AI agents.

    Key Benefits:

    • Free, virtual, global access on March 12
    • Full session recordings available to all registrants – never miss a session!
    • Network via channels + win speaking slots next year, webinars, or newsletter articles!

    Presented by TMMi America Foundation.

    Register now (limited spots!):
    https://tmmiamerica2024.zohobackstage.com/TestFormation2026